The Mind-Body Connection: Massage Therapy Can Enhance Musculoskeletal Health

The Mind-Body Connection: Massage Therapy Can Enhance Musculoskeletal Health

During rehabilitation, a person's existing beliefs about their body's condition are continuously challenged and refined. This happens as their brain compares these prior beliefs with new sensory information. This sensory input comes from both their inner environment (like interoception, which is the sense of the body's internal state, and proprioception, which is the sense of body position) and their outer environment (exteroception, which is the sense of external stimuli). This ongoing process of prediction and adjustment is key to recovery and improved function.

As healthcare professionals, we constantly strive to understand the intricate mechanisms that underpin health and well-being. One increasingly influential concept is predictive processing. This framework offers a powerful lens through which to view how our brains and bodies constantly strive to make sense of the world, both inside and out.

What is Predictive Processing?

Imagine your brain as a prediction machine. It's not just passively receiving information; it's actively generating hypotheses about what's coming next, based on past experiences and learned patterns. This involves a dynamic interplay of two key mechanisms:

  • Top-down (Prior beliefs): This is where our prior knowledge, expectations, beliefs, and even our emotional state influence how we interpret sensory information. Think of it as your brain "predicting" what it expects to perceive. Our attention acts as a filter, highlighting what's relevant and sometimes even suppressing what doesn't fit our predictions.

  • Bottom-up (Sensory Input): This refers to the incoming sensory data from our bodies and the external environment. Our proprioceptors, interoceptors, and exteroceptors are constantly sending signals to the brain, providing the "reality check" against our predictions.

When our top-down predictions closely match the bottom-up sensory input, our brain operates smoothly. However, when there's a significant mismatch, it creates a "prediction error." This error signal then drives learning and adaptation, updating our predictive models to better anticipate future experiences.

The Role in Health and Well-being

Predictive processing profoundly impacts how we perceive, process, and respond to internal and external stimuli, directly influencing our health and well-being (Nara et al., 2025; Santamaría-García et al., 2025). For instance:

  • Pain Perception: Chronic pain is often understood through a predictive processing lens. If our brain consistently predicts pain based on past experiences, even subtle sensations can be amplified and interpreted as pain.

  • Stress Response: Our appraisal of a situation (top-down) heavily influences our physiological stress response (bottom-up). If we predict a threat, our body prepares for it, even if no immediate danger exists.

  • Physical and Mental Health: Mental health conditions can involve maladaptive predictive models, leading to biased interpretations of social cues, heightened threat perception, and an impaired ability to anticipate positive outcomes.

How Massage Therapy Fosters Adaptability and Resilience

This is where the power of interventions like massage therapy comes into play. During rehabilitation, a person's existing beliefs about their body's condition are continuously challenged and refined. This happens as their brain compares these prior beliefs with new sensory information. This sensory input comes from both their inner environment (like interoception, which is the sense of the body's internal state, and proprioception, which is the sense of body position) and their outer environment (exteroception, which is the sense of external stimuli). This ongoing process of prediction and adjustment is key to recovery and improved function. Massage therapy isn't just about relaxing muscles; it can profoundly influence our predictive models of the body and its environment, fostering adaptability and resilience in several ways (Draper-Rodi et al., 2024; Keter et al., 2025; Packheiser et al., 2024). For example:

  • Updating Body Maps: Through touch and proprioceptive input, massage can provide novel, non-threatening sensory information to the brain. This can help to update body maps, challenging maladaptive predictions of pain or dysfunction.

  • Reducing Threat Perception: The gentle, intentional touch of massage can signal safety and reduce sympathetic nervous system activation. This helps to downregulate threat predictions, allowing the brain to perceive some bodily sensations as less threatening and more benign.

  • Enhancing Interoceptive Awareness: By bringing focused attention to internal bodily sensations in a safe and supportive environment, massage can improve interoceptive awareness – our ability to accurately perceive and interpret signals from within our own bodies.

  • Promoting embodied self-regulation: Through these mechanisms, massage therapy can help individuals develop more flexible and adaptive predictive models. This allows them to better anticipate and respond to internal and external challenges, fostering greater resilience and a sense of control over their own well-being.

In Conclusion

Understanding predictive processing offers a powerful framework for healthcare professionals to conceptualize how embodiment shapes our health experiences. By integrating interventions like massage therapy, which can directly influence these predictive models, we can empower people to foster greater adaptability, resilience, and ultimately, a more positive and healthy relationship with their own bodies and the world around them.

Predictive processing is a comprehensive framework that helps explain various aspects of the clinical encounter. It posits that the brain constantly makes predictions about the world and then updates those predictions based on sensory input. The predictive processing framework offers a way to investigate the mechanisms through which massage therapy and other mind-body interventions improve health and well-being. In this framework, massage therapy can be viewed as a multidimensional approach that exposes people to novel input in an attempt to facilitate adaptability and resilience in dynamic environments.


References and Sources

Draper-Rodi, J., Newell, D., Barbe, M. F., & Bialosky, J. (2024). Integrated manual therapies: IASP taskforce viewpoint. Pain reports, 9(6), e1192. https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001192

Grosso, F. (2025). Integrating psychological and mental health perspectives in disease management: improving patient well-being. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-7.

Harrison, L. A., Gracias, A. J., Friston, K. J., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2025). Resilience phenotypes derived from an active inference account of allostasis. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 19, 1524722. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1524722

Hermans, E. J., Hendler, T., & Kalisch, R. (2025). Building Resilience: The Stress Response as a Driving Force for Neuroplasticity and Adaptation. Biological psychiatry, 97(4), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.10.016

Kang, B., Yoon, D. E., Ryu, Y., Lee, I. S., & Chae, Y. (2025). Beyond Needling: Integrating a Bayesian Brain Model into Acupuncture Treatment. Brain sciences, 15(2), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020192

Keter, D. L., Bialosky, J. E., Brochetti, K., Courtney, C. A., Funabashi, M., Karas, S., Learman, K., & Cook, C. E. (2025). The mechanisms of manual therapy: A living review of systematic, narrative, and scoping reviews. PloS one, 20(3), e0319586. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319586

Kiverstein, J., Kirchhoff, M. D., & Thacker, M. (2022). An Embodied Predictive Processing Theory of Pain Experience. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-022-00616-2

Lersch, F. E., Frickmann, F. C. S., Urman, R. D., Burgermeister, G., Siercks, K., Luedi, M. M., & Straumann, S. (2023). Analgesia for the Bayesian Brain: How Predictive Coding Offers Insights Into the Subjectivity of Pain. Current pain and headache reports, 27(11), 631–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-023-01122-5

McParlin, Z., Cerritelli, F., Rossettini, G., Friston, K. J., & Esteves, J. E. (2022). Therapeutic Alliance as Active Inference: The Role of Therapeutic Touch and Biobehavioural Synchrony in Musculoskeletal Care. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 16, 897247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2022.897247

Miller, M., Kiverstein, J., & Rietveld, E. (2022). The predictive dynamics of happiness and well-being. Emotion Review, 14(1), 15-30.

Nadinda, P. G., van Laarhoven, A. I. M., Van den Bergh, O., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Peters, M. L., & Evers, A. W. M. (2024). Expectancies and avoidance: Towards an integrated model of chronic somatic symptoms. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 164, 105808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105808

Nara, S., Baliki, M. N., Friston, K. J., & Ray, D. (2025). The Functional Anatomy of Nociception: Effective Connectivity in Chronic Pain and Placebo Response. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, e1447242025. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1447-24.2025

Packheiser, J., Hartmann, H., Fredriksen, K., Gazzola, V., Keysers, C., & Michon, F. (2024). A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis of the physical and mental health benefits of touch interventions. Nature human behaviour, 8(6), 1088–1107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01841-8

Párraga, J. P., & Castellanos, A. (2023). A Manifesto in Defense of Pain Complexity: A Critical Review of Essential Insights in Pain Neuroscience. Journal of clinical medicine, 12(22), 7080. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12227080

Quinlan, E. B., Baumgartner, J., Chen, W. G., Weber, W., Horgusluoglu, E., & Edwards, E. (2024). Promoting salutogenic pathways to health through complementary and integrative health approaches. Frontiers in psychology, 15, 1473735. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1473735

Santamaría-García, H., Migeot, J., Medel, V., Hazelton, J. L., Teckentrup, V., Romero-Ortuno, R., Piguet, O., Lawor, B., Northoff, G., & Ibanez, A. (2025). Allostatic Interoceptive Overload Across Psychiatric and Neurological Conditions. Biological psychiatry, 97(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.06.024

Sedley, W., Kumar, S., Jones, S., Levy, A., Friston, K., Griffiths, T., & Goldsmith, P. (2024). Migraine as an allostatic reset triggered by unresolved interoceptive prediction errors. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 157, 105536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105536

Smart, P. R., Fair, N., Fraser, S., & Boniface, M. (2024). Burdening the Predictive Mind: A Predictive Processing Approach to Health-Related Burdens. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h8scp

Tabor, A., & Constant, A. (2023). Lifeworlds in pain: a principled method for investigation and intervention. Neuroscience of consciousness, 2023(2), niad021. https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niad021

Varangot-Reille, C., Pezzulo, G., & Thacker, M. (2024). The fear-avoidance model as an embodied prediction of threat. Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 24(5), 781–792. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-024-01199-4

Whyte, C. J., Corcoran, A. W., Robinson, J., Smith, R., Moran, R. J., Parr, T., ... & Hohwy, J. (2024). On the minimal theory of consciousness implicit in active inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06633.